what happened to malchus after jesus healed his ear
Although the other writers mention the event, Luke is the only one who records the miracle. He is the Technical Director for bible.org and also owns Galaxie Software that producesThe Theological Journal Library that has 30 conservative, evangelical theological journals available in Logos, Wordsearch, Accordance and Online. And he touched his ear, and healed him. The ear was 'cut off'. Not just the outward healing but the inward healing and the ability to perceive and hear the voice of God. ugly business. His special talent is listening, hearing. While we could look at some spiritual and symbolical implications regarding his ear, Malchus' experience tells us something else: That he lost his ear by the hand of a disciple of Christ. mystery schools and cults; it is fair to poke at my thoughts Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Are you referring to anti-semitic scholarship in the sense this is not what marks jesus is saying , right? When the soldiers arrive to arrest Jesus, Peter attacks the servant of the High Priest, cutting off his ear with a short dagger (). of the writers. It actually manifested more vainglory than faithful courage or nobility. Even though the incident of the servant's ear being cut off is recorded in all four gospels, Matthew 26:51; Mark 14:47; Luke 22:51; and John 18:10-11; the servant and the disciple are named as Malchus and Simon Peter only in John. I don't say this with irreverence; I simply don't know how Jesus healed him. The Miracles of Jesus Christ: Water Into Wine (Part One), The Miracles of Jesus Christ: Water Into Wine (Part Two), The Miracles of Jesus Christ: Healing a Nobleman's Son, The Miracles of Jesus Christ: The Great Catch of Fish, The Miracles of Jesus Christ: Exorcism in the Synagogue, The Miracles of Jesus Christ: Healing Peter's Mother-in-Law, The Miracles of Jesus Christ: Healing a Leper (Part One), The Miracles of Jesus Christ: Healing a Leper (Part Two), The Miracles of Jesus Christ: Healing a Leper (Part Three), The Miracles of Jesus Christ: Healing a Paralytic (Part One), The Miracles of Jesus Christ: Healing a Paralytic (Part Two), The Miracles of Jesus Christ: Healing a Cripple by a Pool (Part One), The Miracles of Jesus Christ: Healing a Cripple by a Pool (Part Two), The Miracles of Jesus Christ: Healing a Cripple by a Pool (Part Three), The Miracles of Jesus Christ: Healing a Withered Hand (Part One), The Miracles of Jesus Christ: Healing a Withered Hand (Part Two), The Miracles of Jesus Christ: Healing a Centurion's Servant (Part One), The Miracles of Jesus Christ: Healing a Centurion's Servant (Part Two), The Miracles of Jesus Christ: Healing a Centurion's Servant (Part Three), The Miracles of Jesus Christ: Raising a Widow's Son, The Miracles of Jesus Christ: Stilling a Storm, The Miracles of Jesus Christ: Two Demon-Possessed Men Healed (Part One), The Miracles of Jesus Christ: Two-Demon Possessed Men Healed (Part Two), The Miracles of Jesus Christ: Two Demon-Possessed Men Healed (Part Three), The Miracles of Jesus Christ: Healing a Woman With a Flow of Blood, The Miracles of Jesus Christ: Resurrecting Jairus' Daughter, The Miracles of Jesus Christ: Healing Two Blind Men (Part One), The Miracles of Jesus Christ: Healing Two Blind Men (Part Two), The Miracles of Jesus Christ: Feeding the Five Thousand (Part One), The Miracles of Jesus Christ: Feeding the Five Thousand (Part Two), The Miracles of Jesus Christ: Walking on the Water (Part One), The Miracles of Jesus Christ: Walking On Water (Part Two), The Miracles of Jesus Christ: Exorcising a Syro-Phoenecian (Part One), The Miracles of Jesus Christ: Exorcising a Syro-Phoenician (Part Two), The Miracles of Jesus Christ: Healing a Deaf-Mute (Part One), The Miracles of Jesus Christ: Healing a Deaf-Mute (Part Two), The Miracles of Jesus Christ: Feeding the Four Thousand, The Miracles of Jesus Christ: Healing the Blind Man from Bethsaida, The Miracles of Jesus Christ: Exorcising a Young Boy (Part One), The Miracles of Jesus Christ: Exorcising a Young Boy (Part Two), The Miracles of Jesus Christ: The Coin in the Fish's Mouth, The Miracles of Jesus Christ: Healing a Man Born Blind (Part One), The Miracles of Jesus Christ: Healing a Man Born Blind (Part Two), The Miracles of Jesus Christ: Healing a Man Born Blind (Part Three), The Miracles of Jesus Christ: Healing a Stooped Woman (Part One), The Miracles of Jesus Christ: Healing a Stooped Woman (Part Two), The Miracles of Jesus Christ: Healing a Man With Dropsy, The Miracles of Jesus Christ: The Resurrection of Lazarus (Part One), The Miracles of Jesus Christ: The Resurrection of Lazarus (Part Two), The Miracles of Jesus Christ: Ten Lepers Healed, The Miracles of Jesus Christ: Healing Blind Bartimaeus, The Miracles of Jesus Christ: The Withering of a Fig Tree, The Miracles of Jesus Christ: Healing Malchus' Ear (Part Two), The Miracles of Jesus Christ: A Second Large Catch of Fish (Part One), The Miracles of Jesus Christ: A Second Large Catch of Fish (Part Two), The Miracles of Jesus Christ: Healing Malchus' Ear (Part One). I think it is odd that someone who is made blood-soaked cloak to indicate that there ever was a Because another excludes it doesn't mean that it is false. (And Malchus is a name meaning king, which isinteresting.). to express appreciation for your detailed interaction with what Ive written! The rest of the disciples (including the sword swinger) got away from 500 soldiers. So Malchus was on the wrong side of historythe losing side. Your rendering of Paul through Acts is hard for (A follower of Jesus is pally with the HP!?!?). Surly Straggler vs. other types of steel frames. What arrogance! Why, of course: [I]t is hard to imagine Christians, eager to depict themselves and their leader as not violent revolutionaries, making this incident up. This shames us all! Ill try to offer something more substantial than 'Thank you' in response at some point, but I didnt want to wait . is founded on biased, weak analysis of comparative religion. A swordsman does not make a diagonal strike to the opposite side of the head. If Jesus did not heal the ear that was cut off, then why was it not presented as evidence to aid in the requests for crucifixion? Luke 22:50-51: And one of them struck the servant of the high priest and cut off his right ear. Malchus (/mlks/) was the servant of the Jewish High Priest Caiaphas who participated in the arrest of Jesus as written in the four gospels. That is why the religious rulers wanted to kill Jesus, the word of God in flesh. Yet, like all those that preceded it, this miracle gave form and shape to what Christ would do in the ministry of reconciliation. d) Andrew and Peter. into Jerusalem proper, people who know of him treat him with As Malchus strains his ear his whole ear he can hear The apostle Simon Peter cut off Malchus' ear with a sword. And you have not even attempted to prove (from the text of scripture) that it was otherwise. On the day of Pentecost, alone, he showed that the sword of the kingdom is a spiritual sword. Imo. For if they had agreed Then a sudden warmth. To show that Jesus was a lover of his enemies, and not just another bandit who planned to overthrow Rome and failed. Jesus heals a blind man in Ch8 right before Peter's confession of Jesus as the Messiah denoting the halfway climax and part 1 of Mark's account. Luke Chapter 22. Sons of God, Daughters of Men and Giants Why are they in the Bible? blows. John tells us 50 years later which might indicate that he was part of the early church. Also, there are other stories, instances that some gospels include that others do not. Luke 22:52-53. ", Earl Doherty, November 2013 (personal email), "I want to say here that this site is so resourceful and highly on top of the most modern scholarship in the areas discussed here. (See Matthew 1:18-25; Luke 1:26-38) In the Bible's New Testament, Jesus is the Messiah (the Christ) who was promised by the Bible's Old . Does he? wound. Do not put this on a website. (There may additionally be some allusions to the Jewish War of 66-70+ but thats another discussion. first, he was healed, second, he was healed/free from his master. rubric for interpreting the NT, as well as apocryphal texts. Meanwhile, others who have read ahead just a little, even as far as verse 36, have found this: 36Jesus said, My kingdom is not of this world. The disciples wanted to defend Jesus and themselves. In this depiction, Jesus heals Malchus' wounded ear, leaving the latter to stay behind sitting dumbfounded in a state of disbelief, suggesting a possible conversion to Christianity. You have stated your contrary opinion to the text that was quoted. The servant of the high priest lost his entire right ear when Peter swung in his direction! Take my yoke upon you and And when he had touched his ear, he healed him (Luke 22:50-51). But now More importantly, you cant share the work with the Mediator. . Does that mean that one is lying, or could it mean they are less detailed? Malchus was the servant to the high priest. Jesus was trying to tell us the true Father has no limits. The arrest did not take Jesus by surprise. This fictional story is based on Luke 22:49-51. 51 And Jesus answered and said, Suffer ye thus far. (The servant's name was Malchus.) This merciful act would be His last miracle before being crucified (Matthew 26:47-56; Mark 14:43-50; Luke 22:47-53; John 18:1-12). John tells that the perpetrator of this crime was Simon Peter, known for his impetuous words and actions. Christ elected to perform a miracle of mercyof outgoing love and faithfulnessto show the grace of God in action even during the most stressful of times. He ruled in a world with a relationship to the Father. as clearly revisable. In Luke 22:50,51 - And one of them smote the servant of the high priest, and cut off his right ear. Peter, who cut off Malchus' ear, had a history of impulsive behavior. Hampton is cofounder of bible.org. . This High Priest, whose hands will soon be bound, will use His hands one last time to show kindness to an enemy. Wind paraphrases, if not transmission of quasi-verbatim statements by Jesus himself, But the crowd has moved on now, torchlight diminishing, voices receding. Now that makes excellent poetic sense to me. Perhaps he was even trying to impress his fellow disciples. The 12 were blind to Jesus identity in part 1 until Jesus helped them to see, and in part2 they were blind to his mission (dying on a cross) until the end, when they finally understood. Malchus, the . The only crime they claimed was that Jesus was claiming to be king and that meant that he opposed Caesar. "Ive even been cited by atheists with approval (which I really dont know how to take, so thanks, I think, but Im not sure,Vrider(even though I feel like I need to take a shower now)). 8 Jesus answered, "I told you that I am he. Luke 22:49-51, on the other hand, tells us, "When those around Him saw what was going to happen, they said to Him, "Lord, shall we strike with the sword?" He moves among the crowd Now Caiaphas arrives, puffing, strutting, taunting. It does not say anything about picking up a detached ear, reattaching it, regrowing it, or questioning the fact that Jesus was a healer as had previously and amply been proven prior to his arrest. Jesus only rebukes his disciples. Is there a proper earth ground point in this switch box? The . There seems also to be a strange idea present in your remarks: that hellenistic means something like Greek pure and simple; it is clearer to say that hellenistic means precisely not Greek but under Greek (later Roman) domination. Yes, for the same type of reason as we find in Johns gospel, but without some of Johns elaborations. Your answer contradicts the text which the Questioner stated. enemies. Perhaps none or very few of the rest of them were armed. One can hope! James F. McGrath suggests that this account reflects an event that did happen, in that early Christians would hardly have invented a story portraying themselves as violent.[1]. As far as I am concerned, this episode screams fiction more loudly than anything else. Comment: Christ worked this miracle in the same moment that He was submitting to His cruel enemies. Using Kolmogorov complexity to measure difficulty of problems? (If you're a human, don't change the following field). . http://vridar.org/2013/12/11/the-devils-father-and-gnostic-hints-in-the-gospel-of-john/, 10 Then Simon Peter, who had a sword, drew it and struck the high priests servant, cutting off his right ear. . (John Loftus has a blog that is about Debunking Christianity and this is quite a different site.) You got me bang to rights. We take note of the many enemies who threaten us; we become very anxious and perhaps even angry when we see the cause of evil advancing. Ed, Issue 46, Winter 2023. If the Gospels are generally supposed as history, then one would think that a Of course I am not the 1st to think such a wild thought. (51) But Jesus answered and said, "Permit even this.". rooted in Pauls Christology, is Greco-Roman cultic documentation. This parable had a two fold meaning (which most do) . Pride is also evident in his action. Please carry on. Now it is night, Passover night, and Malchus goes on a Index:Kritik der Evangelien und Geschichte ihres Ursprungs, Erster BandClaremont.djvu Index:Kritik der Evangelien und Geschichte ihres Ursprungs,, After a little more tinkering I believe I have found that my main problem has been getting a clear enough. Malchus must have his ear restored, and so it was. Then in Marks gospel Jesus remains silent when Pilate asks him if he were a king. Though he is specifically named only in John 18:10-11, he is also found in Mark 14:45-49, Matthew 26:50-54, and in Luke 22:49-53 as the "servant of the high priest.". Jesus restored the servant's ear, told Peter to put his sword away, and the band of soldiers arrested Him . The courtyard is astir with news of Jesus' capture. It does not say anything about picking up a detached ear, reattaching it, regrowing it, or questioning the fact that Jesus was a healer as had previously and amply been proven prior to his arrest. hellenists that want to coopt the Jewish scripture without to be really Jewish. reflects Malchus. think about the equivocation of anointed one, as In many ways, it is like St. Paul's experience on the road to Damascus, when the risen Lord appeared to him. 47 But one of those who stood by drew his p sword and struck the servant 1 of the high priest and cut off his ear. Shall I not drink the cup the Father has given me?, My kingdom is not of this world. I realize this is site is about debunking Christianity, but as Stuart Chase so aptly put it For those who believe, no proof is necessary; for those who dont, no proof is possible.. time he stares at his ear in the mirror. This pictures what Christs work on the cross would be like. intense animosity towards Rome by what is seen at least the rulers he's familiar with. Additionally this is a true story on Lukes account because, as a physician, he wished to highlight the power Jesus had to heal us on every level. He restores his ear. According to John's Gospel ( 18:10 ), the servant's name was Malchus. I expect McGrath will be looking for an excuse to ban me, too, now. They move View More Bible Stories View Luke Chapter 22. The raw material of the story was quite likely borrowed from the Gospel of Mark and the fourth evangelist has elaborated it a little to adapt it to his own theme. (c.1450). You are spot on. Then he touched the servant's ear and healed him. "The Nazarene This was owing to Christ as the merciful High Priest. the torches reappears. Its a game of Lets pretend we are reading a version of historical reports. Yet, amid all of this, Jesus chose to show mercy to His captors and to glorify His Father by submitting to His will. much more valuable than what is actually present to us. Anyone who reads my blog regularly knows that I do not consider the mythicists who actually participate in the scholarly process to be pseudoscholars. I simply judge them to be unpersuasive. In my book, The Two Gospels of Mark: Performance and Text, I propose that the cutting of the ear has dramatic consequences later in the play. Why would they have done so? Luke 22:47-51 Also read: Matthew 26:51-54, Mark 14:44-47, John 18:10-11. To subscribe to this RSS feed, copy and paste this URL into your RSS reader. Good points. NET Bible. reader would be able to harmonize their content with known historical facts. I think it expands, and contributes to, the effort in honouring Thomas that we with Lukasz originally had in mind with this volume. John 18:10 tells us the servant's name was Malchus. There are also quite likely other symbols involved that are now lost to us. 48 And Jesus said to them, . 46 And they laid hands on him and seized him. There is for sure nothing hellenistic about the Acropolis! clarification you have offered, reveals to me that his letters Jesus' words flood back, " To seek and save the I can hazard guesses like anyone else but thats all theyll be. It is necessary to establish the theological message. Why dont Matt, Mark and Luke mention Peter? John 18:10-11. Malchus lost his ear. God is the head. It is part of the need of the suffering Messiah. him. . Malchus returns to his room and removes his stiffening cloak and I shall have to read it, too. So how was Jesus able to heal Malchus, the servant of the high priest, after his right ear was cut off (read Luke 22:50-51)? Words of concern for him, an enemy, deeply involved in the In addition to being an act of peace and forgiveness, and an example for us to follow, this case also symbolizes Jesus treatment of people who have disabilities, people who are injured in the line of duty, and healing for those who commit violence and/or are traumatized by their acts in law enforcement or the military. out of one mouth, this becomes a very great demonstration of the On this Wikipedia the language links are at the top of the page across from the article title. I have shed innocent Maccabean, the Roman conquest, then to bar Kochbas He cannot forget those Jesus healed the ear without having to reattach or regrow it, meaning that the man had a wound that healed and stopped bleeding. My books are available in paperback and Kindle from Amazon. Matthew 26:51-54. This is a most interesting passage and totally misunderstood. I think it is only with hindsight projecting the developments that were only finished in the 3rd or 4th century onto his text that we would think he is not just another ultra-devout Jew of the period, characterized by one among the available sectarian (messianic) tendencies, which he maybe carried to a certain fanatical extreme, or if you prefer, to its logical conclusion But I dont see why we need any influence of Greekness to explain this sectarianism, messianism and extremism; on the contrary, they are sort of a Judean speciality of the period to judge from e.g. ", "These reviews of yours are so bloody weird! It is also about understanding from a secular perspective as per the scholarship of anthropologists, sociologists, psychologists, etc the origins and nature of religions. However, Peter was not willing to let his Master be hauled off without a fight. And the name of the servant was Malchus (John 18:10). Pain ceases, and the flickering light of Christ had just said in Peters hearing: Let these go their way (John 18:8). Jesus concludes. He was found several days later in a temple, discussing affairs with some of Jerusalem's elders. They bound him 13 and brought him first to . But Jesus answered and said, "Permit even this." ahhhhnow I see, I must have slept through it the first time, Thank You Angela.Youve shown me there are a few TRUE SAINTS leftThanks. Luke 22:50 And one of them smote the servant of the high priest, and cut off his right ear. If you want to know what 1st c Jews understood by the word messiah the best text will of course be the letters of Paul. What was the relationship Between Jesus and Malchus (slave of the High Priest Caiaphas) The book of John records an interesting event that took place in the Garden of Gethsemane. Required fields are marked *. All the Just before his action, he had asked Christ, Lord, shall we strike with the sword? However, he did not wait for an answer (Luke 22:49-50). 7Again he asked them, Who is it you want?, 8Jesus answered, I told you that I am he. Indeed, even Pauls dangerous un-Jewish excesses in connection with his messianic enthusiasm are not so unlike those found among the followers of Sabbatai or Schneerson, though perhaps not too much should be made of this; these excesses are latent in messianic ideas, which will inevitably look different before and after they are attached to individuals and events. What you make of those passages will depend on your view of Acts. ", "Fantastic. He lived, died, and rose again so that one day He could fulfill His own inspired words from Isaiah 61:1: He has sent Me to heal the brokenhearted, to proclaim liberty to the captives, and the opening of the prison to those who are bound. Yet, his captors and eventual slayers, in their ungodly malice, could see His good words and works only as threats and Him only as an enemy, a man to shame, wound, and kill. Thats not the sort of detail one would normally expect to be singled out by a shocked eyewitness and the Gospel of John is richly symbolic throughout. The Fire Gospel, a 2008 novel by Michel Faber, centers on the discovery of the fictional lost gospel of Malchus. Mark doesn't mention it, because it's not part of his bigger theme he wants his readers to learn. The servant's name was Malchus. 10 Then Simon Peter, who had a sword, drew it and struck the high priest's servant, cutting off his right ear. . Peter didnt seem to wait for an answer (v. 50). Who did Peter strike with a sword, and what mortal blow did he inflict? In the Kabbalah the right ear signifies wisdom, especially as it concerns memory, prophecy and spiritual objectives. 3. thinks the servant. They had come from the chief priest to arrest Him. I got banned at exploding our cakemix by the good doctor the other day. They were carrying torches, lanterns and weapons. Pilate's quarters, hears the Roman's pathetic attempt at washing Compare the later scene where he breaks the commandment by tearing his robes (Leviticus 21). close every day. Such ungoverned passion rarely leads to righteous action. All you have to go by is that he wrote in Greek (like Josephus) and that Christianity, which might be called a religion of the Greeks, came about through him (a point that is irrelevant to historical description of him.). Gentiles lord it over them, and their high officials exercise
what happened to malchus after jesus healed his ear